In 1989, a task force appointed by the Chancellor created
a questionnaire to be administered to all graduating seniors
at UIUC. The results of the survey, the Chancellor said, "will
be useful in responding to requests for information on how
our students feel about the educational experience they have
had as undergraduates here and in identifying problems on campus
which need our attention." The survey was administered
each year from 1990 to 1993. Due to the consistency of results
the survey was not administered again until 1996.
The 1996 survey was modified to include a section of items
asking students to assess their entering and exiting abilities.
Due to the usefulness of this new section for campus initiatives
involved in the assessment of student outcomes, the campus
decided to restart annual administrations of the survey.
For the first time the Senior Survey was administered electronically
in 1998. In March 1998 an e-mail message regarding the Senior
Survey was sent to all seniors on the May graduation list.
The e-mail message from the Chancellor asked students to complete
the survey posted on a university Web-site. Ten days following
the initial e-mail message a follow-up message was sent reminding
students to complete the survey. Survey respondents were entered
into a lottery with a single prize of two free airline tickets
valued at $500 each. Of these 4,200 seniors, 1,683, or approximately
40%, responded. Similar to past years, the respondents were
roughly representative of the graduating class by gender, ethnic
Percentage of Respondents All Seniors
| Gender |
|
|
| Male |
48.2 |
48.6 |
| Female |
51.8 |
48.1 |
| Ethnic Origin |
|
|
| Caucasian |
78.0 |
75.9 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
3.3 |
4.4 |
| African-American |
4.0 |
5.3 |
| Asian-American |
13.6 |
12.5 |
| Native American |
.0 |
0.3 |
| Unknown 1 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
| College of Graduation |
|
|
| ACES |
7.0 |
7.4 |
| Applied Life Studies |
3.4 |
4.0 |
| CBA |
19.1 |
15.1 |
| Communications |
2.9 |
3.4 |
| Education |
1.8 |
3.3 |
| Engineering |
20.1 |
15.6 |
| Fine & Applied Arts |
5.8 |
7.8 |
| Liberal Arts & Sciences |
35.8 |
41.5 |
Care should be taken in interpreting the results of the survey
because the small number of respondents in some sub-categories
makes the results statistically unreliable. This summary presents
highlights of the data following the general order of the survey,
a copy of which is attached to this report. A "Comparison
to Previous Years" section at the end of the summary presents
yearly comparisons of survey results.
Demographics
Survey respondents present a picture of a very traditional
student body, with large majorities enrolling as freshmen and
completing a bachelor’s degree in eight semesters at age 21
or 22. The respondents were 79% Caucasian and
92% Illinois residents. Approximately 4% more females than
males responded to the survey.
Academically, 70% of the respondents self-assessed their grade-point
average as between 2.75 and 3.75. Approximately 50% of the
students never changed their major, while another 38% changed
majors once. Approximately 40% of the respondents reported
working each semester part-time while another 40% reported
working "occasionally" part-time. Approximately 70%
of the respondents worked during the summer.
First enrolled at UIUC as:

Number of times you changed major while at UIUC:

Did you change your career choice?

Did you participate in volunteer or community service
work?

Did you seek personal counseling?

Do you have a disability?

Number of semesters it took to complete your degree:

Current age:

Gender:

Ethnic origin:

Approximate GPA:

Citizenship:

Employment while undergraduate*:

* Totals more than 100% because some students
worked both summers and part- or full-time during school year.
Satisfaction with broad aspects of the undergraduate
experience
The survey asked about senior satisfaction in three broad
categories, and then, in a brief fourth section, about the
overall experience at UIUC. Students were asked to choose from
a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one for lowest satisfaction
to five for highest satisfaction. The broad categories were:
• Teaching and educational environment included
18 questions on the quality of teaching and facilities,
access to courses and faculty, class size, and teachers’
evaluation of students.
• Campus environment included 13
questions on racism, sexism, welcome, help, and atmosphere.
• Self-assessment of entering and exiting
abilities required students to assess their
entering and exiting competency levels in 20 abilities,
including writing, speaking, organizing time, and
using technology.
• Overall undergraduate experience included
four questions: satisfaction with the overall educational
experience at UIUC, current attitude toward UIUC, attitude
toward the respondent’s major, and what the respondent
would do given the chance to start all over again.
The categories were an organizational device, making it inadvisable
to seek generalizations, such as "students were satisfied overall with
the campus environment." Instead, the summary will attempt
to point out noteworthy responses to individual questions.
Before going into the categories individually, a
graphic overview of the average ratings for all teaching,
educational, and campus items is presented below.
Teaching and educational environment
| |
Mean Frequency % |
| |
Low
High |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 1. Quality of teaching by faculty in
your major |
3.9 |
2 |
6 |
18 |
48 |
27 |
| 2. Quality of teaching by faculty outside
your major |
3.5 |
1 |
7 |
38 |
47 |
8 |
| 3. Quality of teaching by TAs |
3.3 |
3 |
13 |
41 |
37 |
6 |
| 4. Quality of laboratories and classrooms |
3.5 |
2 |
10 |
37 |
40 |
11 |
| 5. Quality of academic program advising
and information |
3.0 |
14 |
23 |
27 |
26 |
12 |
| 6. Quality of career advising and information |
3.0 |
13 |
20 |
29 |
27 |
11 |
| 7. Access to courses and course sections
in major |
4.0 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
40 |
34 |
| 8. Access to elective courses and course
sections |
3.5 |
4 |
13 |
30 |
37 |
16 |
| 9. Process of student evaluation of teaching |
3.1 |
8 |
18 |
34 |
31 |
9 |
| 10. Class size at the 100 and 200 course
level |
3.1 |
7 |
19 |
36 |
30 |
8 |
| 11. Class size at the 300 course level |
4.1 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
42 |
40 |
| 12. Overall educational philosophy of
your major |
3.8 |
3 |
8 |
21 |
44 |
23 |
| 13. Fairness of student performance evaluation
procedures |
3.7 |
1 |
6 |
26 |
53 |
13 |
| 14. Usefulness of student evaluation
procedures in assisting students to learn |
3.3 |
3 |
15 |
38 |
39 |
6 |
| 15. Quantity of faculty office hours |
3.7 |
2 |
10 |
29 |
41 |
18 |
| 16. Faculty members’ presence during
posted office hours |
4.0 |
1 |
5 |
21 |
42 |
31 |
| 17. Accessibility of faculty in general |
3.8 |
1 |
8 |
25 |
43 |
23 |
| 18. Communication between faculty and
students regarding student needs and concerns |
3.4 |
4 |
13 |
33 |
36 |
14 |
For all respondents, the items with the highest satisfaction
ratings in this section were:
4.1: Class size at the 300 course level.
4.0: Access to courses and course sections
in major.
4.0: Faculty members’ presence during posted
office hours.
3.9: Quality of teaching by faculty in
your major.
For all respondents, the items with the lowest satisfaction
ratings in this section were:
3.0: Quality of academic program advising
and information.
3.0: Quality of career advising and information.
3.1: Class size at the 100 and 200 course
level.
3.1: Process of student evaluation of teaching.
Campus environment
| |
|
Mean Frequency % |
|
| |
Low High |
| 19. It was easy to meet and get to know
other students |
3.7 |
3 |
11 |
23 |
36 |
27 |
| 20. It was easy to get involved in student
groups and activities |
4.0 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
36 |
35 |
| 21. There was exposure to different student
backgrounds and cultures |
3.9 |
2 |
9 |
19 |
35 |
35 |
| 22a. The classroom environment
was free from racist behavior |
4.1 |
2 |
6 |
16 |
34 |
41 |
| 22b. The classroom environment was
free from sexist behavior |
3.9 |
3 |
8 |
20 |
35 |
34 |
| 23a. The campus environment was
free from racism |
3.0 |
11 |
22 |
30 |
26 |
11 |
| 23b. The campus environment was
free from sexism |
3.4 |
6 |
16 |
31 |
32 |
16 |
| 24a. The University appropriately addressed
problems of racism |
3.3 |
11 |
14 |
29 |
28 |
19 |
| 24b. The University appropriately addressed
problems of sexism |
3.5 |
6 |
10 |
31 |
32 |
22 |
| 25. You felt you were welcome at UIUC |
4.1 |
2 |
5 |
17 |
38 |
38 |
| 26. You had someone (University employee)
that you could go to for help |
3.4 |
13 |
14 |
23 |
25 |
26 |
| 27. The "University" cared
about you |
2.6 |
21 |
24 |
33 |
17 |
6 |
| 28. You felt safe on campus |
3.6 |
3 |
10 |
26 |
42 |
19 |
For all respondents, the items with the highest satisfaction
ratings in this section were:
4.1: The classroom environment
was free from racist behavior.
4.1: You felt that you were welcome at
UIUC.
4.0: It was easy to get involved in student
groups and activities.
3.9: The classroom environment was
free from sexist behavior.
3.9: There was exposure to different student
backgrounds and cultures.
For all respondents, the items with the lowest satisfaction
ratings in this section were:
2.6: The "University" cared
about you.
3.0: The campus environment
was free from racism.
There was a noticeable difference between the ratings on the
items asking if the classroom was free from racist behavior
(4.1) and if the campus was free from racism (3.0). The graphs
below show some of the variation by ethnic background on these
questions. (Please note, as previously indicated, that survey
respondents underrepresented African-American and Hispanic/Latino
respondents. The number of respondents by ethnic origin is
1,313 Caucasian, 229 Asian-American, 67 African-American, 57
Hispanic/Latino, and one Native American.)
22a. The classroom environment was free from
racist behavior.

**No average provided due to having only one respondent.
23a. The campus environment was free from racism.

24a. The University appropriately addressed problems
of racism.

Men and women disagreed about the extent of sexism on campus
and the university’s attempt to address the problem.
22b. The classroom environment was free from
sexist behavior.

23b. The campus environment was free from sexism.

24b. The University appropriately addressed problems
of sexism.

Comparison of Entering and Exiting Abilities
The
respondents reported increases in their entering competency
levels for all but one ("Communicate in a language other
than English") of the abilities listed. The abilities
with the greatest difference between entering and exiting competency
levels were:
+1.6 Effectively use technology (e.g., computers, high tech
equipment)
+1.1 Draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts, and
ideas
+1.0 Locate, screen, and organize information
+.9 Speak effectively
+.9 Understand and appreciate cultural and ethnic differences
+.9 Problem solving skills
Overall undergraduate experience
Mean Frequency %
Low High
1 2 3 4
5
| 49. Your major at UIUC |
4.0 |
3 |
6 |
15 |
38 |
38 |
| 50. Your overall educational experience
at UIUC |
4.0 |
1 |
4 |
17 |
49 |
28 |
| 51. Your TOTAL experience at UIUC |
4.2 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
40 |
42 |
| 52. If you could start all over again,
would you: |
| - attend UIUC again? |
84% |
| - attend another institution? |
16% |
| - not attend college? |
0% |
| - take same major? |
62% |
All of the overall experience items received high satisfaction
ratings in this section. There were some variations in the
overall quality ratings by ethnic background, as shown in the
graphs below. Asian-American and African-American respondents
gave slightly lower overall ratings than did other students.
49. Please rate your major at UIUC:

50. Your overall educational experience at UIUC:

51. Your TOTAL experience at UIUC:

52. If you could start all over again, would you ...
attend UIUC again? (percent indicating yes):

Aspects of the University that were most helpful to
your pursuit of an education at UIUC
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to the Senior Survey,
1,067 (64%) responded to this item. A summary of their responses
is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 11
students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| Access to technology |
17 |
| Variety of course offerings |
13 |
| Excellence of faculty |
13 |
| Helpfulness of faculty/staff |
13 |
| Excellence of college/department/program |
11 |
| Facilities/Resources |
11 |
| Extracurricular activities/organizations |
9 |
| Peers/Other students |
7 |
| Libraries |
6 |
| Vast amount of opportunities |
6 |
| Cultural diversity |
5 |
| Diversity |
5 |
| Size of campus |
4 |
| Advisors |
4 |
| Cost |
4 |
| Reputation of UIUC |
3 |
| Learning environment |
3 |
| Undergraduate research |
2 |
| Study abroad |
2 |
| Greek system |
2 |
| Competition |
2 |
| Career/College placement office |
2 |
| Smaller classes at upper levels |
1 |
Aspects of the university that were obstacles to your
pursuit of an education at UIUC
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to the Senior Survey,
994 (59%) responded to this item. A summary of their responses
is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 10
students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| Poor or non-existent academic advising |
16 |
| Poor teaching by professors |
16 |
| University too large/ "felt like
a number" |
12 |
| Classes too large |
9 |
| Too much bureaucracy/red tape |
9 |
| Professors not caring/helpful |
7 |
| Program requirements (courses, GPA, hours) |
7 |
| Difficulty in getting desired courses |
6 |
| Lack of adequate facilities |
6 |
| Poor teaching by TA’s |
4 |
| Sexual discrimination/Race issues |
4 |
| Poor curriculum/program |
4 |
| Unavailability of professors |
3 |
| Non-relevant classes |
3 |
| Couldn’t understand foreign TA’s |
2 |
| Emphasis on research at the expense of
teaching |
2 |
| Unfair/poor grading |
2 |
| Debate over the chief |
2 |
| Peers |
2 |
How has the university changed since your freshman
year?
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to the Senior Survey,
981 (58%) responded to this item. A summary of their responses
is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 10
students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| More emphasis on technology |
21 |
| Facilities/physical plant |
21 |
| Chief concerns increased |
7 |
| Racism increased |
3 |
| Campus is safer |
3 |
| University is more commercial |
3 |
| University is more expensive |
3 |
| Better alcohol management |
2 |
| More ethnic diversity |
2 |
| Sports (some better, some worse) |
2 |
| University seems smaller |
2 |
| Campus more focused on race relations |
2 |
| Better educational opportunities |
1 |
| More crime and violence |
1 |
| Campus is friendlier |
1 |
| University is more liberal |
1 |
COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS YEAR - Demographics of Respondents
This section of the report will compare 1998 Senior Survey
results to responses recorded in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1997.
The 40% response rate in 1998 was highest ever for the survey.
This year there were slightly fewer African-American and Latino/Hispanic
respondents and slightly more Asian-American respondents than
in past years. Following are some additional
differences among respondents over time.
Satisfaction with broad aspects of the undergraduate
experience
Following is a listing of item mean scores for common items
administered in 1990, 1993, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Overall,
there is consistency of student responses over time. However,
the upward trend for many of the items in 1996 and 1997 continued
in the 1998 data. No single item mean score was lower in 1998
than in 1997 and 18 were higher. Items with increases are marked
with a (+) and items with decreases are marked with a (-).
Four item means increased by +.2 of a point and three means
increased by +.3. These seven items are printed in bold typeface.
| 1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| 3.9 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
1. Quality of teaching by faculty in your major |
| 3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
2. Quality of teaching by faculty outside your major |
| 3.3+ |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3. Quality of teaching by TAs |
| 3.5+ |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
4. Quality of laboratories and classrooms |
| 3.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
- |
5. Quality of academic program advising and information |
| 3.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
- |
6. Quality of career advising and information |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
7. Access to course and course sections in major |
| 3.5 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
8. Access to elective courses and course sections |
| 3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
9. Process of student evaluation of teaching |
| 3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
10. Class size at the 100 and 200 course level |
| 4.1 |
4.1 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
11. Class size at the 300 course level |
| 3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
12. Overall educational philosophy of major |
| 3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
13. Fairness of student performance evaluation procedures |
| 3.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
14. Usefulness of evaluation procedures to learning |
| 3.7+ |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
15. Quantity of faculty office hours |
| 4.0+ |
3.9 |
3.9 |
- |
- |
16. Faculty members’ presence during posted office
hours |
| 3.8+ |
3.7 |
3.6 |
- |
- |
17. Accessibility of faculty in general |
| 3.4 |
3.4 |
- |
- |
- |
18. Communication between faculty and students regarding
student needs and concerns |
| 3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
19. Easy to meet and get to know other students |
| 4.0+ |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
20. Easy to get involved in student groups, activities |
| 3.9+ |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
21. Exposure to different backgrounds and cultures |
| 4.1+ |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
22a. Classroom environment free from
racist behavior |
| 3.9+ |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
22b. Classroom environment free from
sexist behavior |
| 3.0+ |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
23a. Campus environment free from racism |
| 3.4+ |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23b. Campus environment free from
sexism |
| 3.3+ |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
24a. University appropriately addressed racism |
| 3.5+ |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
24b. University appropriately addressed sexism |
| 4.1+ |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
25. Felt that you were welcome at UIUC |
| 3.4+ |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
26. Had someone you could go to for help |
| 2.6+ |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
27. "University" cared about you |
| 3.6+ |
3.3 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
28. You felt safe on campus |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
49. Please rate your major at UIUC |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
50. Your overall educational experience at UIUC |
| 4.2+ |
4.1 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
51. Your TOTAL experience at UIUC |
Student Ratings of Entering and Exiting Abilities
The students’ ratings of their exiting abilities are significantly
higher than their entering ratings in all three years the items
were used. The average rating increase across abilities was
+.8 in 1998, which is higher than the average of +.7 in the
two previous years. Three abilities (printed in bold typeface)
reported entering/exiting gains of at least one rating point.
|
1998 |
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
| Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
|
Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
|
Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
Ability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
Write
effectively |
3.2 |
4.1 |
.9 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
Speak
effectively |
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
|
3.4 |
4.0 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.0 |
.5 |
Create
original ideas |
3.4 |
4.5 |
1.1 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
Draw
conclusions |
3.4 |
4.4 |
1.0 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
Locate/organize
info |
3.3 |
4.2 |
.9 |
|
3.3 |
4.1 |
.8 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
Appreciate
differences |
3.5 |
4.4 |
.9 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Problem
solving skills |
3.6 |
4.2 |
.6 |
|
3.6 |
4.2 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
Get
along with others |
3.5 |
4.0 |
.5 |
|
3.4 |
4.0 |
.6 |
|
3.4 |
3.9 |
.5 |
Appreciate
fine arts |
2.8 |
4.4 |
1.6 |
|
2.7 |
4.2 |
1.5 |
|
2.8 |
4.2 |
1.4 |
Use
technology |
2.7 |
2.7 |
0 |
|
2.5 |
2.7 |
.2 |
|
2.6 |
2.6 |
0 |
Use
another language |
3.1 |
3.8 |
.7 |
|
3.1 |
3.7 |
.6 |
|
3.2 |
3.8 |
.6 |
Understand
science |
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
|
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
|
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
Understand
math |
3.8 |
4.2 |
.4 |
|
3.8 |
4.3 |
.5 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Understand
values/ethics |
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
Work
in groups |
3.7 |
4.5 |
.8 |
|
3.7 |
4.5 |
.8 |
|
3.8 |
4.5 |
.7 |
Learn
on own |
3.3 |
4.1 |
.8 |
|
3.3 |
4.2 |
.9 |
|
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
Organize
time effectively |
- |
3.8 |
- |
|
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
4.3 |
- |
Demonstrate
competency |
- |
4.1 |
- |
|
- |
4.0 |
- |
|
- |
4.0 |
- |
Seek/obtain
employment |
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
Understand
context |
Satisfaction with the campus environment
The tables below show response pattern changes for respondents
with different ethnic backgrounds to several questions regarding
racism on campus and in the classroom. The most noticeable
differences from past years were the slightly higher ratings
given by Caucasian, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian-American respondents,
and the slightly lower ratings given by the African-Americans
respondents.
22a. The classroom environment was free from
racist behavior:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
| Asian-American |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
| African-American |
2.9 |
3.1 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
| Native American |
- |
4.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
23a. The campus environment was free from racism
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
| Asian-American |
2.9 |
2. 6 |
2. 8 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
| African-American |
2.1 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
2.6 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
| Native American |
- |
2.3 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
24a. The University appropriately addressed problems
of racism:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
| Asian-American |
3.1 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
| African-American |
2.3 |
2.4 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
3.2 |
| Native American |
- |
2.3 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
Men and women students continue to differ in their responses
to the questions regarding sexism and sexist behavior on campus
and in the classroom. Women respondents are less satisfied
than men respondents. Both groups reported slightly higher
ratings in 1998 than in the past.
22b. The classroom environment was free from
sexist behavior:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Women |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
| Men |
4.1 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
23b. The campus environment was free from sexism:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Women |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
| Men |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
24b. The University appropriately addressed problems
of sexism:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Women |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
| Men |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
Satisfaction with overall undergraduate experience
The tables below compared student satisfaction ratings by
ethnic background and gender. In general, respondents gave
slightly higher ratings to the item rating their total UIUC
experience. African-American and Hispanic/Latino students appeared
to be less satisfied with their major than did other students.
49. Sa
| Year |
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
1996 |
|
1993 |
|
1990 |
| All Respondents |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.1 |
|
3.9 |
| Women |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
| Men |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
| Caucasian |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
| Asian-American |
|
3.9 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.8 |
| African-American |
|
3.6 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.7 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
|
3.8 |
|
4.3 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
| Native American |
|
- |
|
4.3 |
|
4.5 |
|
- |
|
- |
tisfaction with your major:
50. Satisfaction with overall educational experience
at UIUC:
| Year |
|
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
1996 |
|
1993 |
|
1990 |
| All Respondents |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.8 |
| Women |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
| Men |
|
3.9 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.7 |
| Caucasian |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.8 |
| Asian-American |
|
3.8 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.7 |
| African-American |
|
3.7 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.2 |
|
3.6 |
|
3.7 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
|
4.0 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
3.7 |
|
3.8 |
| Native American |
|
- |
|
4.7 |
|
4.5 |
|
- |
|
- |
51. Satisfaction with TOTAL experience at UIUC:
| Year |
|
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
1996 |
|
1993 |
1990 |
| All Respondents |
|
4.2 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
3.9 |
| Women |
|
4.3 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.1 |
3.9 |
| Men |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.0 |
3.9 |
| Caucasian |
|
4.2 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.1 |
3.9 |
| Asian-American |
|
4.1 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.9 |
|
4.0 |
3.9 |
| African-American |
|
3.8 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.9 |
|
3.6 |
3.9 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
|
4.3 |
|
4.1 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.9 |
- |
| Native American |
|
- |
|
4.3 |
|
4.0 |
|
- |
- |
52. If you could start over again, would you attend
UIUC again?
| Year |
|
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
1996 |
|
1993 |
|
1990 |
| All Respondents |
|
85% |
|
84% |
|
85% |
|
83% |
|
85% |
| Women |
|
87 |
|
84 |
|
86 |
|
85 |
|
88 |
| Men |
|
82 |
|
83 |
|
84 |
|
81 |
|
83 |
| Caucasian |
|
87 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
|
85 |
|
86 |
| Asian-American |
|
78 |
|
74 |
|
81 |
|
79 |
|
79 |
| African-American |
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
61 |
|
58 |
|
70 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
|
82 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
|
79 |
|
79 |
| Native American |
|
- |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
- |
|
- |
|